Content Chapter 1. Three accusers 1.1. Librarian Harduinus: assorting council's documents (p.13) -- librarian Jean Hardouin (Harduinus) in Paris -- recognizes the FAKE Council documents of the FAKE Church 1.2. The linguist Baldauf: proving that all works of Antiquity are a FAKE with stave rhymes (alliteration) and end rhymes (p.16) -- Mr. Baldauf in Basel stated clearly: the works of "authors of Antiquity" contain rhymes+rhymed endings which existed only from about 1100 -- Charlemagne is a LIE - all horror tales are a LIE -- Criminal "Humanists" of the gay drug Vatican invent the writers of "antiquity" -- "Humanist" writing offices all over Europe are composing the "Middle Ages" Book: "History and Criticism" volume 2: "Greeks" and "Romans" (1902) 1.3 Kammeier created the word "Big Action": investigation of writing and data: ALL documents are a FAKE (p.20) -- Mr. Wilhelm Kammeier with the investigation of the INVENTED documents -- All documents and charters of the FAKE "Middle Ages" are FAKE -- The "Big Action" of the cr. Vatican is recognized: The ENTIRE Middle Ages are a FAKE Summary: 1. Hardouin (Harduinus: Research on the FAKE Council documents) 2. Baldauf (Linguistic Research with FAKE Antiquity: stave rhyme and end rhyme) 3. Kammeier (research with fake certificates / deeds) Chapter 2: The blood witnesses INVENTED martyrs of the “Christian” church in INVENTED Rome (p.25)

Chapter 3: Humanists The "Humanist" monks of the Vatican are INVENTING authors and are INVENTING stories, dramas, hero epic tales, etc. Examples: 3.1. The FAKE Roswitha and her FAKE Works (p.31) -- FAKE Roswitha of Gandersheim (10th century): with perfect comedies and dramas in perfect Latin, including a report from a brothel -- No predecessors, no circle of friends, no successors -- The forger is Mr. Conrad Celtes - and a "Latin teacher" -- Classic plagiarism, stolen comedy "Abraham", stolen legend "Pelagius", and a Father Florez steals a legend from FAKE Roswitha for Spain -- The stolen celebratory speech by Widukind is copied from somewhere - Ligurinus is copied from Mr. Otto of Freising, "Epos de bello Saxonico" is copied from Lambert of Hersfeld 3.2 The FAKE poet Apuleius (p.39) The erotic poetry "The Golden Donkey" ("The Golden Ass") with the romance 'Cupid and Psyche' 3.3 Nicholas Cusanus (Cusanus) (1401-1464): a mathematician, physicist and “rediscoverer” (p.43) -- Mathematician, physicist, he called for a new calendar after the defeat of Constantinople in 1454 -- He was also a “rediscoverer”, possibly also a forger and faker 3.4. Conspiracy? (p.43) -- the FORGED Donation of Constantine (4th century) -- FAKE letters from a FAKE pope on a FAKE journey in 1132 -- Niemitz's conclusion: Europe from 800 to 1400 was tolerant and multi-religious 3.5. The FAKE Tacitus and his FAKE Germania (p.45) in an impossible Latin like Sallust

It is clearly stated on the back of the book "The Big Action" (orig. German: "Die Grosse Aktion"): Many characters are purely "fictional".

 
Book "The Great Action" - Book cover  [0a] - Book text on the back [0b]

Foreword

-- The great heroes of history are "straw men" or "inflated balloons" -- false hero worship is like religion with ancestor cult, idolatry, and these false heroes should be toppled from their pedestals, but each individual must do this for themselves (p. 9)

Kammeier has virtually remained unknown
-- Kammeier was the first to claim a "Great Action", and Uwe Topper provides evidence for this: the High Middle Ages and Renaissance are falsified -- Kammeier was rejected for a long time -- the deeds of kings and emperors in the Middle Ages are "beautiful and ugly novels" (p. 9)

Example: Lies about FAKE Charlemagne
-- the allegations about the butcher Charlemagne with 4000 murdered things at a "banquet" or mass murder of 130,000 Saracens by drowning in the river Ebro are lies - moreover the fantasy god has stopped the sun to commit the Saracen murder - THESE ARE ALL LIES (p.10)

-- such mass murders have to be recognized as "fairy tales and lies, propaganda and spins" [of the criminal gay drug Vatican - just for spreading fear] (p.10)

-- Uwe Topper is a member of history circles such as "Berliner Geschichtssalon; Leaps in time (Zeitensprünge), Efodon and others" with discussions and suggestions (p.11)


UWE TOPPER

Uwe Topper, born in 1940 in Breslau, lived for three decades as a freelance writer and artist in South Asia, North Africa, and Western Europe. Numerous academic articles and lectures, as well as several popular science books in German and Spanish, have made him well-known. They cover topics in anthropology, art history, and the history of religions. Uwe Topper has been living in Berlin since 1992.

Topper's books in German:
-- The Legacy of the Giants (German: Das Erbe der Giganten); Edition Walter, Olten 1977
-- The Sufis in the Maghreb (German: Die Sufis im Maghreb); Edition Eugen Diederichs, Cologne 1984
-- Tales of the Berbers (German: Märchen der Berber); Eugen Diederichs Verlag, Cologne 1986
-- Rebirth (German: Wiedergeburt); Edition of pocket books Rowohlt, Reinbeck 1988
-- Earth Inquiry (German: Erdbefragung); Edition Droemer Mr. Th. Knaur, Munich 1988
-- Sufis and Saints in the Maghreb (German: Sufis und Heilige im Maghreb); Edition Eugen Diederichs, Munich 1991
-- The Last Book (German: Das letzte Buch); Edition Heinrich Hugendubel, Munich 1993

Topper's bookds in Spanish:
-- Rock Art, Provincial Disputation of Cadiz (ESP orig.: Arte Rupestre, Disputación provincial de Cádiz) 1988
-- Popular Tales of the Berbers (ESP orig.: Cuentos Populares de los Berberes); Miraguano Editions, Madrid 1993 (p.286)




Chapter 1: 3 Accusers

1.1. Librarian Harduinus: [he assorted the documents of the Church's councils - nothing matches]

-- librarian Jean Hardouin (Harduinus) in Paris
-- recognizes the FAKE Council documents of the FAKE Church

Librarian Jean Hardouin (Harduinus): Analyst and Scholar in Ancient History: Fantasy Jesus and "Last Supper" on a Thursday
-- Jesuit Jean Hardouin (Harduinus), born in 1646 in Brittany, librarian and teacher in Paris, became a member of the "Order of Jesus" in 1666, from 1683 he became head of the royal French library, was a historian, knew ancient languages, archaeology, numismatics, chronology and philosophy of history, published recognized writings
-- he published the speeches of Temistius in 1684 -- he wrote about Horace and numismatics,
-- in 1695 he published an investigation of the day of the death of the fantasy Jesus (p.13) and said that the Last Supper was on a Thursday, "according to the Galilean custom", and not on a Friday (p.14)

Hardouin: Council Acts Published
-- in 1687 he was given the task to rearrange all the acts of the Council from the 1st century to Hardouin, to take dogmatic points of view into account, to prepare prints, King Louis XIV took over the costs, and in 1715 after 28 years this analysis was finished (14)
-- critics' groups like Jansenists etc. mistrusted Hardouin and blocked the release of the acts of the Council for 10 years until 1725 (p.14)

-- Hardouin 1723: critical edition of the natural history of Pliny (p.14)
-- [officially] Hardouin led a flawless way of life (p.14)

Hardouin with the truth about "ancient" authors: they are NOT ancient
-- Hardouin mentioned again and again that ancient authors, e.g. Cassiodorus, Isidore of Seville, St. Justin martyrs etc., are "written many centuries later", e.g. in a justification of his letter to a saint Chrysostom to the monk Caesar - letter from 1690 (p.14)

Hardouin gets only tentative approval
-- Hardouin's colleagues knew about the forgeries but didn't want to let the scandal open, so it received hardly any approval (p.14)
-- Hardouin said clearly that almost all "ancient" writings were forgeries of monks from the 13th century, except Cicero, satyrs of Horaz, natural history of Pliny, Georgica of Virgil (p.14)

-- and Hardouin recognized more forgeries: works of art, stone inscriptions, coins, council acts before the 16th century, the Greek translation of the Old Testament, the Greek original version of the New Testament, all this was recognized by Hardouin as a forgery and "are also said to have been composed very late" (orig. German: "sollen ebenfalls sehr spät abgefasst sein" (p.15)

-- Hardouin said that the fantasy Jesus and his fantasy apostles had "preached in Latin" - and the sheep could not do anything "because the arguments were watertight" and he enjoyed a "high reputation" (p.15)

-- but then, his order gave him a warning and Hardouin made lukewarm "revocations" (p.15)

-- Death in 1729, many followers, many opponents, fanatical written disputes, he referred to the forgery of church documents as a "secret conspiracy against the true faith!", and one of the main perpetrators was to be Archonten Severus (13th century).

-- Hardouin had his list of church fathers with their writings that they had forged - and he cursed the forgers, including a "holy Augustine" (p. 15)

-- The common people soon created the slogan "Hardouin System", which clearly articulated what the Jesus fantasy believers in the Vatican had perpetrated (p. 15)

-- After his death, society relaxed, enjoyed the FAKE texts, integrated them, or discarded them entirely.

-- An opponent of Hardouin was a Jesus Fantasy bishop Mr. Huet, who believed that Hardouin could have had a comfortable life if he had not been so critical ("Hardouin worked hard for 40 years to destroy his good reputation, but he did not succeed.") (p. 15)

-- Another opponent of Hardouin claimed that Hardouin was "too learned" and could not lie (p. 15), or too "vain" (p. 16)

-- Other scholars made only jokes about the truths of Hardouin (p. 16), claiming also that Hardouin wanted to destroy the [Jesus FAKE] faith per se, along with the "pagan writers" (p. 16)

-- And there was also a censorship action by the French Parliament: Some works of Hardouin were banned (p. 16), however, a Jesuit in Strasbourg published the "Preface to a Critique of Ancient Writers" in London (printed in 1766), which is banned in France, and today (2000) can hardly be found (p. 16)

-- The arguments of Hardouin could "never really be completely neutralized" (p. 16)

-- Hardouin could consistently prove FAKE coins, it was him that introduced stricter criteria in historical science (p. 16).



1.2. The linguist Baldauf: [proving that all works of Antiquity are a FAKE with stave rhymes (alliteration) and end rhymes]

-- Mr. Baldauf in Basel stated clearly: the works of "authors of Antiquity" contain rhymes+rhymed endings which existed only from about 1100
-- Charlemagne is a LIE - all horror tales are a LIE
-- Criminal "Humanists" of the gay drug Vatican invent the writers of "antiquity"
-- "Humanist" writing offices all over Europe are composing the "Middle Ages"

stave rhyme, with end rhyme (p.17)


The book by Robert Baldauf "History and Criticism" (orig. German: "Historie und Kritik")
-- Robert Baldauf (1881-1918 [web01]) was the second critic of the FAKE Vatican chronology, he was a linguist, around 1900 professor at the University of Basel (p.16)


"History and criticism" volume 1: The FAKE Charlemagne (1903)

-- Robert Baldauf published a book about the official FAKE-chronology: "History and criticism" (orig. German: "Historie und Kritik"), the 1st volume about the FAKE-Charlemagne was published in Leipzig (1903): Gesta Caroli magni (= Deeds of Charlemagne) (p.16)
-- The data of FAKE Charlemagne were allegedly written down by the monk "Notker" (9th century) in the monastery of St. Gall (p.16) [book by Baldauf: "The Monk of St. Gall" (orig. German: "Der Mönch von St. Gallen") (1903)]
-- This cannot be quite right, because the St. Gallen manuscript of Notker contains words with Romanic or Greek origin which did not exist at the alleged time of Charlemagne (p.16)
-- A pupil of Notker is said to have been Ekkehart IV, who is said to have written texts in the 11th century, but the texts are so "strikingly similar" with those of Notker, (p.16) that it must have been about the same person (p.17)

Horror tales about Charlemagne
-- A monk (Notker) of St. Gallen reports that the FAKE-Charlemagne had beheaded the youth of the Slavic peoples (p.17)
-- The annals of Einhart report that the FAKE-Charlemagne had 4500 Saxons executed near Verden an der Aller (p.17)
(see in "History and Criticism" p.147)

Charlemagne "the Great" FAKE:
-- There were no baths: There are stories told in baths - but for installing baths in Europe the contact to the Islamic Orient is a precondition which did not exist in around 800 (p.17)
-- Inquisition did not exist: there are stories about Inquisition with "divine" water torture, which did not exist in  around 800 (p.17)
-- Notker without "Iliad": the monk "Notker" (9th century) from St. Gallen claims to have known Homer's "Iliad", but Homer's "lliad" was "rediscovered" only in around 1600

Addendum: The Mossad Wikipedia describes the publication of the FAKE "Iliad"
In 1488 was the first Ililas publication in Europe, the manuscripts are said to be "lost" - in 1566 the publication in Paris followed:
"In 1488 the editio princeps (link) was published by Demetrios Chalkokondyles (link) in Florence (link) on the basis of several now lost, inaccurate manuscripts,[122] and in 1566, Henricus Stephanus' (link) important edition was published in Paris under the title "Poetae Graeci Principes Heroici Carminis"."
[Wikipedia web02 - translation]

-- FAKE Homer+FAKE-Bible combined: moreover, Mr. Notker is mixing scenes from the FAKE "Homer" with scenes from the FAKE "Bible" (p.17)
-- Baldauf then analyzes this connection in another volume (p.17)

Bible FAKE with "Iliad"
-- Large parts of the Old Testament are closely "connected" with chivalric novels and with the FAKE-"Iliad" (p.17)
-- One can clearly assume that the Old Testament was created at the time of the FAKE "Iliad" (p.17)

Topper Quote (translation):
"It turns out that large parts of the Bible, especially the "history books" of the Old Testament, are so closely intertwined with the chivalric novels and the Iliad that a common time of origin becomes probable." (p.17)


Book: "History and Criticism" volume 2: "Greeks" and "Romans" (1902)

"Rediscoveries" of "writers of Antiquity" in the 15th century - St. Gallen 1416 - faker Mr. Plautus in Vulgar Latin
-- Mr. Baldauf analyzes "Greeks" and "Romans", thereby he finds "quite astonishing facts" (p.17)
-- The "rediscovery" of classical texts in the 15th century is connected with "strange details" (p.17)
-- In the monastery of St. Gall the "humanists" are said to have made their "findings" in 1416, but there are heaps of "contradictions, darknesses, unexplained things" (p.17)
-- There is said that a certain Mr. Quintilian (p.17) had criticized a certain Mr. Plautus being suspected of being a forger: "The Muses would speak the language of Plautus if they wanted to speak." (p.17)
-- Plautus was writing in "Vulgar Latin", and that was "completely unthinkable" for the year 200 before 0 (p.17)

-- The forgers have even woven jokes into their forgeries, e.g. with Einhard, when a session at table of the FAKE-Charlemagne is described, how he converses with FAKE-"Roman" poets (p.17)

"Writers of the Antiquity" with stave rhymes and end rhymes from the FAKE High Middle Ages from Germany
-- Mr. Baldauf states in the analysis of the "classical-antique poets" that the stylistic devices are "not at all antique", "but typically German", with stave rhyme, with end rhyme (p.17)
-- Already the analysis of Mr. J.v.Müller resulted in a highly "dainty" rhyming in the Casina prologue of Quintilian (p.17)
-- Baldauf presents yet another Latin poetry in the German end rhyme style (p.18)
-- with all this, the final rhyme is only valid in the FAKE-High Middle Ages for the Romanesque poetry by the troubadours (p.18)

Baldauf with Hardouin - and Baldauf has his own philological justifications for the Greek FAKES
-- Hardouin [in Paris] still wanted to recognize "Horace" as genuine, but Baldauf did not want to do so anymore (p.18)
-- Probably Baldauf knew Hardouin's analyses from 200 years earlier, but he did not adopt the theological reasons, but he developed his own philological argumentation (p.18)
-- Baldauf realizes that FAKE Horace and FAKE Ovid are quite similar, so they must have had at least the same source (p.18):

Topper Quote:
"Baldauf recognizes the inner dependence between Horace and Ovid and says (p.33) to the question of how this "quite evident merging of the statements of ancient authors" is to be explained: "Some find it quite harmless and unsuspicious, others at least proceed logically and assume a common source from which the respective authors had taken the content." (p.18)

Strange: The great authors of antiquity did not know each other - originals are all said to have disappeared
-- Baldauf states by quoting E. Wölfflin that the "classical" Latin authors obviously did NOT know each other, "did not take note of each other at all" (p.18)
-- Baldauf states that 1) there are only reconstructions of writings here, 2) that the actual authors of these poems are UNknown, or 3) then there is still a "third" possibility: "»Or would a third one be possible?« asks Baldauf" [that a gang of fakers of the cr. gay drug Vatican had faked the authors of Antiquity pretending a FAKE PAST as a diversionary tactic for the sheep] (p.18)

Language analysis by Baldauf: "Ancient Greeks and Romans" with the stave rhyme of troubadours - with Italian spelling (!)
-- Baldauf proves the stave rhyme of the "High Middle Ages", compared it with the "genuine German Muspilli" and asks: "How does such a late poet as Horace come to have stave rhymes (German: Stabreime)?" (p.19)
-- The FAKE-Horace has not only German elements but also Italian spelling in it, there is an "h" inserted, vowels are exchanged etc. (p.19)
-- Officially these "mistakes" are always blamed on the copyists: "but it must have been only the evil copyists!" (p.19 - Baldauf volume 2 p.66)

Language analysis by Baldauf: The FAKE Caesar and the FAKE "Gallic War" - with German rhythms, stave rhymes and end rhymes
-- The FAKE Caesar with the FAKE "Gallic War" has just such stave rhymes as "inappropriate stylistic features": "It is literally teeming with these forms" (p.19 - Baldauf volume 2 p.83)
-- After the analysis of the last 3 books of the FAKE "Gallic War" and 3 books of the "Civil War" Baldauf thinks: all "these rhyme plays", and for the 8th book of the "Gallic War" (Bellum Alexandrinum and Bellum Africae), written by an A. Hirtius, counts the same, and they all seem to be by the same author: All this [was written] "by one and the same hand" (German: "eine einzige Hand") (p.19)

FAKE Caesar and FAKE "Gallic War": Druids like Egyptian priests - rhythms, end rhymes, stave rhymes - criminal "humanists" falsified all authors of the "Antiquity"
-- The FAKE-"Gallic War" describes druids among the Celts, but they resemble the Egyptian priests, "a very strange parallelism!", says Borber in 1847" (p.19)
-- Baldauf complains: In "ancient stories" there are always such "parallelisms", and "They are called: plagiarisms!" (p.19 - Baldauf: Volume 2 p.84)
-- So, the many rhythms, end rhymes and stave rhymes in the "Poems of Antiquity" were a "normal stylistic device" [of the German writing culture from the FAKE HIGH middle ages] (p.19 - Baldauf Volume 2 p.97)
-- Baldauf concludes: All the "ancient" poets were written almost simultaneously in one single century: "Homer, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Pindar, Aristotle", they are "children of a century", and they were certainly written NOT in Greece (Hellas), but in Italy of the 14th/15th century etc. (p.19)


Criminal humanists in Italy have fabricated the "Antiquity" and the FAKE Bible - and humanist writers' groups across Europe have invented the "Middle Ages"
-- Mr. Baldauf concludes: Romans and Greeks did not exist; rather, they are all fabrications by "Italian humanists". Topper comments on Baldauf:
"Their homeland surely was not ancient Hellas, but Italy of the 14th/15th centuries. Our Romans and Hellenes were the Italian humanists." (p.19)

[And when "humanists" falsify history, it is anything but "human", but a global crime for misleading the masses - penal code].

Baldauf states it clearly:
-- the criminal Vatican with "humanism" falsifies the authors of "Antiquity" of the FAKE Greeks and of the FAKE Romans: on papyrus, on parchment, on ore, on stone (p.20)
-- the criminal Vatican with "humanism" also falsifies the FAKE Bible (p.20)

Topper quote (translation):
"I would like to quote his concluding words [the words of Baldauf] (p. 97 f.):
»Let us draw conclusions: The claim is that the old poets like Homer, Aeschylus, Sophocles, Pindar, Aristotle had lived in long temporal distances, but we have to regroup them closer together. They are all surely children of one century. Their homeland, however, has been certainly not ancient Greece, but Italy of the 14th/15th century. Our Romans and Hellenes were the Italian humanists.' (p. 19)

Once again: the history of the Greeks and Romans written on papyrus and parchment is entirely that which is written on ore, stone, etc. - for the most part, [this is] a brilliant fraud of Italian humanism. . . Italian humanism has gifted the earth with the written fixed [FANTASY] world of antiquity and the [FANTASY] Bible, and in conjunction with humanists from other countries, the [FANTASY] history of the early Middle Ages [was composed]. The period of humanism has not been a receptive time of scholarly gathering zeal, but rather a world of the most original, productive, and most monstruous intellectual [criminal faking] activity: this path lasted more than half a millennium for which he was the guide.
These assertions sound adventurous, more than strange. But they can be proven. Some of the evidence is presented here, others will follow, until humanism is recognized in its innermost essence. It would be foolish to have just normal life leaving out all the thesis presented here.«" (p.20)

-- The criminal Vatican with "Humanism" has its "Humanist" writing groups all over Europe, where the Middle Ages are invented (p.20)
-- They have spent their time only with forgery, with "the most inherent, productive, monstrous intellectual activity - for over half a millennium" (p.20)
-- The "innermost essence" of "Humanism" is FORGERY (p.20)
-- According to Topper, Mr. Baldauf could publish only 2 volumes. Topper:
"To my knowledge, Baldauf has not succeeded in publishing any further volumes besides the two mentioned" (p.20)
-- And Topper suspects: Perhaps one can still find manuscripts for additional volumes, where surely more surprises can be found (p.20).
"that his manuscripts, if they can be found, may still contain many surprises." (p.20)

Topper quote:
"To my knowledge, Mr. Baldauf has not succeeded in publishing any additional volumes besides the two mentioned. Regarding the structure of the work, which also includes the very late drafting of the [FANTASY] Bible, it can be said that his manuscripts, if they can be found, may still contain many surprises." (p. 20)


1.3 Kammeier created the word "Big Action": [investigation of writing and data: ALL documents are a FAKE]

-- Mr. Wilhelm Kammeier with the investigation of the INVENTED documents
-- All documents and charters of the FAKE "Middle Ages" are FAKE
-- The "Big Action" of the cr. Vatican is recognized: The ENTIRE Middle Ages are a FAKE

The 4 basic required data for a valid document / charter: Who to whom, when and where
-- Mr. Wilhelm Kammeier was a lawyer, lastly a school teacher in Thuringia in Central Germany, he died impoverished in the 1950s (p.20)
-- He dealt with the "documents of the Middle Ages", whereby "deeds / charters" (e.g. for donations or privileges) must "fulfill four main requirements": who - to whom - when - and where (p.20):
"They must show who issued this deed to whom, when and where." (S.20)
-- The authors of the FAKE documents have omitted many details (p.20)
-- Often the "full date" is missing, i.e. the year or the day or both" (p.20) - without a date, a document is "legally worthless" (p.20)

Mr. Harry Bresslau with "Handbook of Document Teaching: Deeds in the FAKE "Middle Ages" often have NO date or have an IMPOSSIBLE date
-- Mr. Kammeier examined e.g. the multi-volume edition [Handbook of Document Teaching - German: Handbuch der Urkundenlehre - 2 volumes] by Mr. Harry Bresslau (Berlin 1889 to 1931) (p.21)
-- Bresslau still thought that many documents were genuine (vol. II, p.442ff), but from the 9th to the 11th century "some document writers" had a deficiency in the "mathematical sense", "also in the Imperial [Papal] Chancellery ("auch in der [Päpstlichen] Reichskanzlei")" (p.21).

Quote Topper:
"Presenting examples he makes clear how things worked at that time: from January of the 12th regnal year of Emperor Lothar I (corresponding to 835 AD), the dating jumps in February to the 17th regnal year of the same emperor, but only retains this until March and from May onwards brings the 18th regnal year for more than two and a half years. Under Otto I, two charters were issued with “anno incarnationis 976”, although they belong to the years 955 and 956, etc. Such errors are also frequent in the papal chancellery." (S.21)

-- Bresslau looks for excuses for the date errors and concludes, however - quote Topper on Bresslau:
"There remain an excessive number of documents with completely impossible dating." (S.21)
(original German:  "Es bleiben übermäßig viele Urkunden mit völlig unmöglicher Datierung." (S.21)

-- Mr. Bresslau does not recognize the forgeries but thinks that if errors appear again and again, they are "proof of the authenticity of the documents" (p.21)
-- Even if many documents show dates that were "added later" (p.21)
-- It was only Mr. Kammeier who recognized the whole document forgery of the FAKE Middle Ages first (p.21)

Topper quote:
"But he [Bresslau] does not think of forgery - on the contrary: If mistakes are repeated several times, these are [for him] evidence of the authenticity of the documents! And this is even the case, although many dates have been added later or are presented in a way that does not allow us to recognize it anymore, but also does not exclude it, as he himself knows. With all his zeal, this highly educated man could not elevate himself sufficiently above the subject he had studied to be able to question it. That has only been accomplished by Kammeier." (p. 21)

Bruno Krusch on the FAKE charters of the FAKE "Middle Ages":
-- Bruno Krusch (born 1880) published a chapter "Studies about Frankonian Diplomatics" ("Studien zur fränkischen Diplomatik")" (1937) in his work "Studies about Christian Medieval Chonology" ("Studien zur christlich-mittelalterischen Chronologie" - 2 vols., Berlin 1938) (p.278)
-- In this chapter "Studies about Frankonian Diplomatics" (1937) Mr. Krusch states that in certain documents "some letters are missing": Krusch: "The gap is left empty", but this could have been done intentionally in order to enter later beneficiaries (p.22)
-- He complains about "massive [...] forged and falsified documents" - "silly forgeries" with "unbelievable year counts" (p.22)
-- Already Mr. Henschen and Mr. Papebroch recognized the document on the privilege of Chlodovech I as a forgery in the 17th century (p.22)
-- A "diploma" from King Chlothar III for Bze is a "crude forgery" (p.22)
-- The "collection of documents Chronicon Besuense" is a "forgery of the 12th century" (p.22 - Krusch: p.9)

Karl August Friedrich Pertz (1828-1881) with a collection of Merovingian documents / deeds / certificates / charters
-- In 1872, Pertz published a collection of documents (p.22)

Supplement: The edition of the Merovingian charters was criticized to such an extent that the charters of the Carolingians were not published
The Mossad Wikipedia reports (translation):
"The highlight of his independent work for the MGH was to be the publication of the charters of the kings of the Merovingians. When [the first volume] appeared in 1870, it was heavily criticized (especially by Theodor Sickel - link) [2] and this maneuver enabled his father's long-time critics to overthrow him as the sole and all-determining editor. The edition [of the second volume] of the charters of the Carolingians up to 840 prepared by Karl Pertz, which was to appear in 1871, was thus also shattered [3]."

-- Bruno Krusch praised Pertz's first volume because he recognized many forgeries: 97 Merovingian charters and 24 Hausmeier charters were supposed to be "genuine", but 95 Merovingian charters and 8 Hausmeier charters were recognized as FAKE (p.22)
-- Krusch said that one should continue like this and all document researchers should finally recognize and eliminate all forgeries (p.22)
-- Krusch then recognizes even more forgeries in Pertz's work: with "invented palaces, cuckoo's eggs in style, false dates" (p.22)

-- Kammeier then finally recognizes ALL documents as FAKE (p.22)


1991: Niemitz about Kammeier with the book “Kammeier, critically honored”: NO originals or common models available - all MA documents are FAKE

-- Mr. Hans-Ulrich Niemitz publishes an article about the work of Kammeier in 1991 (p.22): "Kammeier, critically honored" (orig. German: “Kammeier, kritisch gewürdigt”),  in the review: Prehistoric-Early-History (orig. German: Vorzeit-Frühzeit-Gegenwart) 3-4/91, p.92 (Gräfelfing) (p.279) - and it remains clear: Kammeier's conclusion that ALL documents are a FAKE remains, because any original is MISSING (p.22):

Topper on Niemitz:
“Indeed, there is no original manuscript of any important document or literary work of the Middle Ages, not even the ”common model" on which the various copies are based (p.22). The family trees of the surviving copy chains show this with persistent stubbornness. In view of such a large number, this can no longer be attributed to chance. Kammeier draws the conclusion: “The many allegedly lost ”common templates“ never actually existed.” ([In: The Fake of German History (orig. German: Die Fälschung der deutschen Geschichte) - reprint] 1980, p. 138) (p.23)

-- Kammeier clearly stated the thesis that the German emperors and kings lived without residences, i.e. without palaces or castles, sometimes they were “in two places at the same time” or “they passed too long distances in too short a time”, the calendars (‘itineraries’) of the emperors and kings are a “random back and forth” (p.66ff) (p.23)
-- Many charters are without date, or without place, or without recipient, with Henry II a good 33% are in this way, with Conrad II almost 50% (p.23)
-- Such documents cannot be used in court, so they do not seem to have been produced for a “practical purpose” [but for decorative purposes or something] (p.23)
-- Surprisingly, the forged documents are not isolated cases, but almost the rule, because “there are almost no genuine documents” (p.23)
-- In the case of forged documents, sometimes is even changing the writing within the document (p.23)

Quote Topper: Kammeier stated:
"There are almost no genuine documents. The forgeries are often extremely poorly executed, and sometimes even the writing itself is not correct." (S.23)

-- there are documents where old text was scraped off parchment and new text was written over it (so-called “palimpsest”) - in those cases, the “forgers' guild” apparently simulated “genuine” parchments for the documents (p.23)
-- Topper concludes: “This much is certain: the contradictions between the individual documents are absolutely true.” (S.23)
-- Kammeier says clearly: All these FAKE documents should “pretend history”, “fill a gap” (p.23), should “anchor ideological foundations [...]” (p.23-24) - but legally the FAKE documents are “worthless” (p.24)
-- Errors did not matter to the forgers, after the first date errors the dateline remained “open” and waited for a “general guideline” [maybe they waited for a calendar reform with a new recalculation] (p.24)
-- Kammeier invents the term “The Big Action”, and the backdating of the documents was never completed, so the date lines remained empty (p.24)

“The Great Action”: rushed and hasty
-- Topper believes that this poetry of the “Big Action” was executed hastily and in a hurry WITHOUT a plan, and that “thinking a plan into it” afterwards is “impossible” for him (p.24)
-- one of the earliest “humanist” [fakers] was Nikolaus Kusanus, and all "Jesuits" participated in the “creation of history”, which is supposed to block the masses' view of the true past (p.24). Quote Topper (translation):

“From the earliest humanists like Nicholas Cusanus to the Jesuits, there has been a creation of history that affects us all because it is blocking our view of what really happened.” (S.24)


Summary:
1. Hardouin (Harduinus: Research on the FAKE Council documents)
2. Baldauf (Linguistic Research with FAKE Antiquity: stave rhyme and end rhyme)
3. Kammeier (research with fake certificates / deeds / charters because of 4 points and scripture analysis)

-- Mr. Topper clearly means that NONE of the "three prosecutors presented here" wanted to discover forgeries, but step by step each of the three had to recognize more and more that all documents are a FAKE (p.24)
-- With Mr. Topper's work it was exactly the same for him: More and more documents turned out to be fake: "I felt the same way myself." (p.24)

Loss of truth research
-- Documents and works of the truth researchers have sometimes even been lost, because
-- The cr. Gay Drugs Vatican Church forced researchers to "retract" (p.24)
-- The state power or the Church has issued "prohibitions" (p.24)
-- There were "accidents" (something is said to have happened in "Lacunza" [without description what]) (p.24)
-- Truth-seekers ("truth promoters") are also impoverished and lose their works through "simple poverty" (p.24)
-- This is how "testimonials of the accusers" are destroyed (p. 24)



Chapter 2: The blood witnesses

INVENTED martyrs of the “Christian” FAKE church in INVENTED Rome

Slogan: “Ave, Deo, morituri te salutant.” (“Hail, [Fantasy] God, the consecrated to death are giving you a salute!")

FAKE martyr: Ignatius
-- The FAKE pacifist Ignatius is said to have converted lions to vegetarian animals in an arena in about the FAKE year of 115 (after FAKE Jesus) by raising his right hand, and so the lions would have turned back to the exit and Ignatio would have survived (p.25).
-- but perhaps he was also eaten (p.25)
-- or Ignatius is a FAKE from the 12th century in a “novel” (p.25)
-- or Ignatius was invented in the 15th-16th century as a historical figure (p.25)

FAKE martyrs of the FAKE Church is a principle
-- The fakers of the cr. Vatican have invented many martyrs, “indeed tens of thousands” (p.25) [and the Fantasy Jesus is such an invented martyr, but he is a special type with the code 33 of the Freemasons, and this code 33 is REAL just as the criminal satanic Freemasons are unfortunately REAL]
-- Topper claims: Perhaps there were martyrs, but then they were “not Christians” (p.25)

-- “Christians” with a “raised hand” in an arena is IMPOSSIBLE, because the audience in FAKE Rome wanted to see fights with gladiators, with spear, throwing net etc. (p.26)
-- Moreover, “Christians” in a lion ascension squad would rather pray to the FANTASY God with the proclamation that they will arrive at the top in a moment (p.26).


Heaps of documents about FAKE martyrs - but first there was the “underworld” for the dead, and only from about 1200 onwards the idea of a “heaven” came
-- There are countless FAKE acts about FAKE martyrs, mostly about "Christians" who had to fight against lions or crocodiles and always lost and were eaten - or who "fell" with a raised right hand ("right hand gesture") "against other believers" - then they experienced the immediate ascension (p.26)
-- the problem here is that the idea of "heaven" for the dead only exists since the end of the FAKE Middle Ages, because before, the idea was dominating that the dead went to the "underworld" (p.26)

Quote Topper (translation):
"If I may add one more thing: The files of the martyrs (yes, files, official) fill volumes of books that would no longer fit in my room. So many! And all documents are describing Christians who were eaten by lions or eaten by crocodiles in the arenas or fell in the battle with the right hand gesture against people of other faiths. And then, they went straight to heaven, which only exists in this form since the end of the Middle Ages. Before that, they went to the underworld - if at all. As a good Christian, you "slept" until the Last Judgement came." (S.26)


The “Christian” poets of the FAKE martyrs: “Origenes” with 21 secretaries: 7 young men - 7 older men - 7 virgins
-- All these “martyr stories” are FAKE of the “Church fathers” [from the cr. forger Vatican] (p.26)
-- Such a forger was a Mr. “Origen” [Latin: Origenes] (the name fits: “the original one”), and according to Euseb (Church History VI, 23) he had exactly “21 secretaries at his disposal” who wrote down the dictated fantasies of Origen: “wrote down everything that the holy man dictated.” (S.26)
-- They were divided into groups of seven and served 8 hours each, and Origen “did not sleep, otherwise he would never have been able to dictate the enormous number of books that are attributed to him today (6000 copies, plus the Hexapla, a sixfold [Fantasy] Bible, which also comprises 25 volumes in the modern edition; he also traveled a lot).” (S.26)
-- There were 7 young men in the morning, in the afternoon 7 “mature men, and then seven virgins (that was probably the night shift).” (S.26)
-- Correction was probably never made, because 7 people are controlling themselves [the code 7 should already regulate this] (p.26)
[-- and 7 virgins during the night is just a nice bumbum session, a kinky lust orgy being payed by the Vatican]

Spain Asturias: FAKE stone relief with FAKE martyr miracle from the FAKE Middle Ages [kap2 photo1]

"Martyr miracle: Stone relief at the entrance of the church of San Miguel de Lillo in Asturias, allegedly consecrated in 842. The relief is said to have been created after a Byzantine model from the 6th century (Photo: U. Topper). (p.27)

-- So it's all a hoax, and the martyr fantasies are pure moral sermons: “to make an example of them” (p.28)
-- All other faith groups are supposed to be “pagans”, many "pagans" are supposed to have killed “Christian martyrs”, and this is supposed to give the cr. Church now the right to “kill all pagans”, e.g.: “kill witches by drowning, burning Giordano Bruno or expel Jews.” (S.28)

[And you can see here again how the cr. Church is acting: They INVENT that "Christians" have been killed, and for that then they COMMIT genocides against other religions - genocide is the principle of the Church - see Europe and colonialism in Latin "America", Africa and Asia - and the terror mission with cross, corpse and alcoholism is not forbidden to this day].

-- The martyr fantasies are supposed to describe events from the 1st, 2nd or 3rd century, although there were hardly any “Christians” in Italy at that time, they only existed from the 11th century, in Byzantium “100 years earlier”, where they were “recruited from Gnosticism” (p.28)

Topper quote (translation):
"For what purpose was this done? They invented founding fathers of faith and martyrs [were INVENTED] to set an example with them. If those were killed by pagans then, then should be now the right to kill pagans, this means: killing witches by drowning, to burn Giordano Bruno, or to expel Jews.
The inventor of martyrs is thus the Inquisition [of the Papacy]. The Holy Inquisition.
This [Inquisition] was installed or reformed by a pious pope around 1460, namely by Silvio de Piccolomini as Pius II. (Pius = pious). Pius I, the Holy One (he died in 157 as a martyr), probably never existed [and is another FAKE martyr]; he is as invented as the other martyrs.

With these martyrs and founding fathers of faith, an entire era has been filled, as if there had already been Christians in the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd century. They only existed for us from the 11th century onwards. In Byzantium, it looked somewhat more civilized, as they existed there a hundred years earlier.  They were not even freely invented there, but recycled from scrap metal: recruited from Gnosis." (p.28)


The martyrs of the FAKE Inquisition - it is not even clear when the FAKE Inquisition began - earliest mention 1215
-- Ratzinger claims: Inquisition began in 1542: Cardinal Ratzinger said on Jan. 22, 1998 that the Inquisition was installed in 1542 and that the 4500 volumes of the Inquisition up to 1903 have now been “released for the public” (p.28)
-- Topper says: Inquisition began in 1310: According to Topper, however, Inquisition began much earlier, e.g. with the burning of women in Paris on May 31, 1310 with victim Marguerite Porete, whose book "Mirror of the simple souls" (orig. French: “Miroir des simples âmes”) “had already been publicly burned before” (p.28)
-- Inquisitor General is said to have been William of Paris, his neighbor was “Master Eckehart”, he knew about it (p.28)
-- Steiger+Heinsohn mean: Inquisition began in 1360: Otto Steiger and G. Heinsohn published a book "The destruction of the wise women" (orig. German: “Die Vernichtung der weisen Frauen”) in 1985 and on page 23, they named the period from 1360 to 1700 for the Inquisition (p.28)
-- Meyers Lexicon says: The Inquisition already existed in 1215: At the Lateran Council of 1215, the Inquisition is said to have already existed: “public presentation, murder by fixing in a wall, punishment forcing the victims to galley ships, burning (of living humans as well as dead bodies recovered from graves [corpses of "heretics" who died becaus of the "Christian" torture in the prison already were thrown onto the pyre]) etc.”. - Popular uprisings, on the other hand, had no sense (p.29) - In 1535 there was a pyre in Paris murdering people in the fire, this “bad habit existed there until 1772, in Switzerland until 1782”
-- In Italy, the Inquisition is said to have lasted from 1235 to 1859, when people were also sentenced to galley service, the last victims was a Protestant couple in 1852 (p.29)

[Supplement: The mass robbery of the criminal Catholic Church by the Inquisition
With the Inquisition there came bullying, defamation, torture, and coerced FAKE confessions that became normal, and collective punishment was applied to the entire families. In this way, nearly all possessions and properties of the Christian states came into the hands of the Church through confiscation - it was only Napoleon who dealt with the criminal Church and the posters with the family names of the condemned were removed from the churches. But bullying and defamation of criminal Christians for destroying existences of truthers and logic thinking people is going on against all other cultures. This happens to this day against all other cultures because the criminal Catholic Church has not given up its claim to world domination inventing a line of Tordesillas from 1494 to today - otherwise the criminal NATO would have nothing to do any more. This is the crux for the end of the Christian World War for a FANTASY Jesus and a Christian FANTASY God - Mother Earth has long taken over large parts of the world population and thus the world is becoming increasingly stable WITHOUT church - and Fantasy Moses or Fantasy Muhammad are not needed either - Status: July 20, 2025].

The FAKE Ignatius (Ignatius of Antioch) and his FAKE letters - invented by “humanists” in the 16th century
-- The FAKE Ignatius of Antioch was once a FAKE disciple of the FAKE apostle John, together with the FAKE bishop Polycarp (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius was FAKE bishop of the Syrian FAKE church of Antioch and was FAKE deported to Rome in the year 110 (others say in the year 116) and executed there because of his FAKE faith (p.29)
-- On the way he meets many FAKE bishops and he is allowed to FAKE write many FAKE letters, 6 to FAKE churches in Asia Minor and one to FAKE bishop Polycarp (p.29)
-- These FAKE letters of FAKE Ignatius are said to be the only early Christian FAKE letters, “immensely precious”, because they fill the time between the FAKE Jesus with the FAKE New Testament (NT) and the Church FAKE Fathers of the FAKE Church with their early FAKE Jesus fantasy theologians (p.29)
-- So imagine: These FAKE letters of FAKE Ignatius: Topper quote, “They are the only truly Christian witness for the entire second century.” (S.29)
-- The FAKE letters of the FAKE Ignatius are formulated in the “baroque style”, Ignatius testifies his faith according to the Council of Nicaea, “which took place only 210 years later” (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius defends the FAKE death on the FAKE-cross of the FAKE Jesus against “dissenters” (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius claims that the FAKE Mary remained a FAKE virgin (“immaculate”) even after giving birth and that she gave birth to the FAKE son of the Fantasy God (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius describes in his FAKE letters the structures of the Jesus Fantasy church [in the state of about 1450] (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius claims that the FAKE prophets of Judaism existed: “confirms the Old Testament prophets as non-Jews and pre-Christians” (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius fights heresies [other beliefs of the world] that arose much later, etc. But on the whole he says nothing that could be considered (p.29)
-- The FAKE Ignatius gives his FAKE comments on the FAKE Pauline Epistles, describes the FAKE Last Supper, and lying priests like to learn to reproduce his lies (p.30)
-- The contradictions in the FAKE-letters of FAKE Ignatius are gigantic, and the Church FAKE authority then simply redefines the Ignatius FAKE letters 100 to 300 years later inventing another author, the FAKE Ignatius should then be a lie (p.30)
-- In reality, the FAKE Ignatius letters are to be placed in the 16th century. Topper (translation): “Today I don't care which humanist of the 16th century forged these letters.”

-- There was once a Jesus Fantasy Abbot Mr. Drioux, Abbé, who published a book in 1873: "Elementary overview of church history" (orig. French: "Précis élémentaire d'Histoire ecclésiastique"; Paris 1873) (p.276)
-- In this book, Mr. Drioux says that the FAKE-Ignatius had arrived in Rome, wanted to be taken immediately to the amphitheater, where everyone was already waiting for him - he heard the roaring of the lions - but he only became stronger in his Jesus Fantasy faith, he pretended happiness and a peaceful joy - then 2 lions came, ate him up immediately and his big Fantasy bones, which remained, were collected by the Jesus Fantasy believers of Fantasy Rome and kept as “precious treasure” (p.30)

-- Topper thinks that the fantasy bones were perhaps then sold, and maybe also deportation to the amphitheater without any judgment does not seem possible and true either - so the cr. Vatican deceives the whole world with novels and “letters” being “presented as facts” (p.30)

General questions: WHAT really happened before 1400? WHO falsified “Antiquity” and the “Middle Ages”?
-- There is the question about what really happened before the year 1400 on the Planet when “Antiquity” and “Middle Ages” are only INVENTION (p.30)
-- “Antiquity” and the “Middle Ages” have been INVENTED by Jesus Fantasy monks and Jesus Fantasy theologians and “their writing groups” (p.30)
-- You can find it out by analyzing the FAKE books of FAKE “antiquity” (p.30)


Chapter 3: Humanists
The "Humanist" monks of the Vatican are INVENTING authors and are INVENTING stories, dramas, hero epic tales, etc.

-- Uwe Topper now presents some examples of criminal "Humanists" who participated in the INVENTION of "Antiquity" and the "Middle Ages" (p. 31)

-- Criteria for analysis are
1. the time of origin
2. the literary genre and
3. the method how the forgery was detected and exposed. (p. 31)

Historical fabricators presented in Topper's book:
-- FAKE-Roswitha of Gandersheim (10th century): with perfect comedies and dramas in perfect Latin, including a report from a brothel (p. 31)
-- FAKE-Apuleius: The erotic poem "The Golden Donkey" with the romance "Amor and Psyche" (p. 31)
-- FAKE-Tacitus with the FAKE Germania in a Latin that does not even exist (p. 31)

Mentioned literature
-- Book by Joseph Aschbach: Roswitha and Conrad Celtes (orig. German: Roswitha und Conrad Celtes); 2nd edition 1868
-- FAKE Apuleius: The Golden Donkey (The Golden Ass)
-- the translation of the “Golden Donkey” ("The Golden Ass") into German was made by Nikolaus von Wyle in 1480 - revised by August Rode in 1783, republished in 1923 (p.41)
-- Essay by Franz Brunhölzl (1971): On the Problem of the Cassinese Classical Heritage (orig. German: Zum Problem der Casinenser Klassikerüberlieferung - essay Marburg Scholar Society (Marbuger Gel. Gesellschaft) nr. 3, Munich) (1975); [In]: History of Latin Literature of the Middle Ages (Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters) (Munich)
-- Book by Nikolaus Kusanus (Cusanus): Analisationof Quran: Cribratio Alkorani ("Viewing the Quran" - German: "Sichtung des Korans“, 3 books) (S.42 and [web05])
-- Book by Nikolaus Kusanus (Cusanus): "Calendar Improvement" (Reparatio kalendarii, 1436)
-- Essey by Lorenzo Valla (secretary of the pope): about the FAKE of the "Donation of Constantine" (orig. German: Über die Fälschung der "Konstantinischen Schenkung") - printed by Ulrich from Hutten in 1519 (p.43)
-- Book by Heribert Illig: The Invented Middle Ages (orig. German: Das erfundene Mittelalter) 1996
-- Book by Hans-Ulrich Niemitz: Kammeier, critically honored (orig. German: Kammeier, kritisch gewürdigt) 1991
-- Speech by Uwe Topper: "Who actually invented the Germans?" (orig. German: "Wer hat eigentlich die Germanen erfunden?") - Hambourg 1996, printed in June 1996
-- Book by Ludwig Pralle: The Re-discovery of Tacitus (orig. German: Die Wiederentdeckung des Tacitus); Fulda 1952
-- Book by Eduard Norden: The Germanic prehistory in Tacitus' Germania (orig. German: Die germanische Urgeschichte in Tacitus Germania); 1920
-- Book by Eduard Norden: Ancient Germania (orig. German: Alt-Germanien) 1934
-- Book by Arno Mauersberger: Tacitus Germania 1980
-- Book by Siegfrid Fischer-Fabian: The first Germans (orig. German: Die ersten Deutschen); Munich 1975
-- Book by Max Oberbreyer: The Germania of Cornelius Tacitus (orig. German: Die Germania des Cornelius Tacitus
-- Book by Franz Brunhölzl: About the problem of Cassino classic tradition (orig. German: Über das Problem der Casinoer Klassikerüberlieferung) 1971
-- Book by Robert Baldauf with his language research: History and critics (orig. German: Historie und Kritik) 1902
-- Book by E. Koestermann: Little essays (orig. German: Kleine Schriften); 3rd ed., Leipzig 1970



3.1. The FAKE Roswitha and her FAKE Works

-- FAKE Roswitha of Gandersheim (10th century): with perfect comedies and dramas in perfect Latin, including a report from a brothel
-- No predecessors, no circle of friends, no successors
-- The forger is Mr. Conrad Celtes - and a "Latin teacher"
-- Classic plagiarism, stolen comedy "Abraham", stolen legend "Pelagius", and a Father Florez steals a legend from FAKE Roswitha for Spain
-- The stolen celebratory speech by Widukind is copied from somewhere - Ligurinus is copied from Mr. Otto of Freising, "Epos de bello Saxonico" is copied from Lambert of Hersfeld


The FAKE Roswitha of Gandersheim with UNpossibilities
-- Is also said to have been called  Hrotsuit "in an old way", is said to have lived 935-973 [she is said to have died at the age of 38], she is said to have been a German Jesus fantasy nun in the monastery of Gandersheim near Braunschweig [today Lower Saxony, Germany] (p.31)
-- Is INVENTED by the “Humanists” as the “first German woman poet”, with FAKE books in Medieval Latin (p.31)
-- The literary lexicons (especially Walter Killys 1990) cannot find any references to Roswitha of Gandersheim in other literature, she “lives” only through her “own writings” - her FAKE Latin teacher is said to have been the FAKE abbess Gerberg (940-1001) (p.31-32)
-- They [the “Humanists” of the Vatican crown] have WRITTEN “9 famous legends and dramas” to FAKE Roswitha until the year 959 - at the age of 24 years - and the FAKE-Latin teacher was at most 19 years old then (p.32)
[Can all this be real? NO]

The INVENTED literature of FAKE Roswitha of Gandersheim
-- the literary lexicon of Killys describes that the works of FAKE Roswitha would be “burlesque martyr stories” (p.32)
-- There is an “unusual legend” from Córdoba (Spain), told by an “eyewitness”: A 10-year-old boy Pelagius remained steadfast “Christian” and resisted sexual abuse by the Caliph Abder-Rahman (‘III’), so the boy preferred “martyrdom” (p.32)
-- There is an "unusual legend" describing a FAKE Calimachus, who also expressed his FAKE sexuality on FAKE dead bodies (p.32)
-- There are also “classically rhymed dramas” [stave rhyme and end rhyme, which only appear in the “High Middle Ages”] with an alliance with the devil, or there was an early Dr. Faustus [copy of Goethe's “Faust”?] (S.32)
-- There are "hetaera dramas", and there is a work about a brothel with "betrayal of virginity" with Abraham and Pahnutius (supposedly the names stand for "The Circumcised" and "The Uncircumcised") -- then the Fantasy god has to "intervene himself", sends abstemious monks to the brothel for "conversion" (p.32)
-- The last INVENTED work for FAKE Roswitha is a FAKE  "Revelation of John" in 35 hexameters (p.32)
-- FAKE-Roswitha repeatedly emphasizes "that as a woman she could not write as well as a man" (p.32)
[-- Why then did FAKE Roswitha write "9 famous legends and dramas" at the age of 24???].
-- FAKE Roswitha is said to have written "flawless Latin" (!), which points to "late Middle Ages" [13th century] (p.33)
-- FAKE Roswitha wrote a “heroic epic”, there “she celebrates the glory of her patrons by singing [...] in panegyric verses” (Panegyrikus=Festrede in “Antiquity” [web03]), the FAKE Emperor Otto I. and the FAKE Emperor Otto II. with "many details of the Ottonian [FAKE] family [...] information that we cannot find anywhere else today"
-- [the history inventors from the cr. Vatican] claim that this FAKE work would be a "historical source" (p.33 )
-- [the history inventors] claim that FAKE Roswitha was a "widely read writer", but the FAKE dramas have only been performed since the 20th century (p.33)
-- The "rediscovery" and presentation of her "splendid manuscript of her works" happened "in 1493 (or actually 1501) by the "widely traveled humanist Konrad Celtes (Pickel) - with "dramas and elogies" in the best Latin, a FAKE nun who had presented [forbidden] sexuality as a topic - that fitted into the Renaissance, and just a short time later, translations into German and "enthusiastic hymns of praise for this FAKE find" followed (p.33)
-- The situation seems IMpossible that FAKE Roswitha had no FAKE predecessors, no FAKE poet friends or FAKE pupils (p.33) [the fakers forgot to fake literature friends and pupils...]

Supplement: A list of FAKE works by FAKE Roswitha can be found on Mossad Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hrotsvitha

[The photo shows the perfect FAKE writing of a text by FAKE Roswitha]:

Work of the forging Humanist historians of the Vatican: FAKE Fantasy of a FAKE Roswitha about an escape of a FAKE Queen Adelheid [chap3 photo1]

Roswitha about the escape of Queen Adelheid (from: L. Stacke, German History, Bielefeld-Leipzig 1896, Plate 145) (p.34)


Fantasy woodcut of Mr. Dürer: showing Fantasy Roswitha handing over Fantasy works about Fantasy kings [chap3 photo2]

"Roswitha presents her works to Otto the Great and Archbishop Wilhelm
of Mainz," woodcut by Dürer for the first printed edition
of Roswitha's works, published in 1501 by Konrad Celtes. From:
L. Stacke, German History, Bielefeld—Leipzig 1896, p. 327) (p. 35)

-- The Vatican Humanists celebrated FAKE Roswitha as "the greatest poetess of the Germans" despite all the IMpossibilities - resistance only arose around 1850 through Joseph Aschbach (he also was an expert on Arabia), who recognized the connection between FAKE Roswitha and the "Humanist" Konrad Celtes, who probably wrote all of works of FAKE Roswitha. Aschbach publishes a small booklet "Roswitha and Conrad Celtes" with over 50 pages.

Supplement: Joseph Aschbach (1801-1882) was a grammar school teacher in Frankfurt am Main and then a university professor in Bonn and Vienna
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Aschbach

Topper quote (translation):
"It was not until the middle of the 19th century that a German historian (and, by the way, an outstanding Arabist) was protesting and tore apart the veil surrounding this nun's mystery: Joseph Aschbach explains to his astonished colleagues how Roswitha and Konrad Celtes are connected; Celtes is the father of history, Roswitha is his brainchild [invented person]. Even the title of Aschbach's little book sounds like a romance novel: Roswitha and Conrad Celtes." (S.36)

Quote from Mossad-Wikipedia (translation):
"Aschbach's work "Roswitha and Konrad Celtes" was a big surprise for the society, in which he attempted to prove that the Panegyric (link) [festival speech] on [FAKE] Emperor Otto the Great (link), previously generally attributed to [FAKE] Roswitha of Gandersheim, was not her work but a poem by Konrad Celtes (link), i.e. from the 16th century. However, this view was proven to be an untenable hypothesis by the historians Rudolf Köpke (link) and Georg Waitz." (link) [The Vatican history inventors have their agents against truthers!]

-- According to Topper, Mr. Celtes is said to have written his works under the pseudonym "Roswitha" for the Enlightenment for the liberation of women from the "Christian [...] yoke" - the forgery is therefore said to have had "honorable backgrounds" (p.36)

-- Topper writes something about "Charitas" and says that the FAKE Latin teacher probably "collaborated" on the FAKE works, but that "remains unclear", in any case these are "ingenious texts in Latin" - and the Catholic "church leadership" then [when there was no Vatican yet] banned FAKE Roswitha from writing as punishment for her truths about life in the brothel etc. (p.36)
-- According to Topper, the “rewriting of the Revelation of John” could have been written by the FAKE nun, but all other works with “salacious (erotic) situations” (according to Aschbach's words) are probably not, but these works are from other authors, namely:
1. by Celtes - who himself also published “erotic poetry” under his own name (p.36)
2. by Pollichius
3. by some other members of Celtes' circle of friends "Rhine Brothers" (German: "Rheinische Brüder") (p.36)

-- Aschbach then examined the original codex of FAKE Roswitha from the 10th century (pp.36-37), which is kept in Munich, whereby Celtes himself made "improvements and additions" (p.37)
-- The examination of the works of FAKE Roswitha for typeface, parchment, ink etc. is missing in Aschbach - because what ink was like in the 10th century was unknown at the time (p.37)
-- In terms of form [type of literature], the works are NOT from a FAKE Roswitha in the 10th century, and in terms of content, the works are from the 16th century (p.37)
-- There are also letters by Celtes (printed in Aschbach's book in the second edition), where Celtes announces the works of "Roswitha" since 1492, "he was collecting materials and encouraging friends to help" - the works of FAKE Roswitha were completed and presented to the public in 1501 (p.37)
-- Suddenly there should be an outstanding woman writer with dramatic poetry in Germany, without a previous development (p.37-38), and this is IMPOSSIBLE (p.37-38)

Topper quote (translation):
“If the dramas were genuine, ”the beginnings of dramatic poetry in Germany would have to be set half a (p.37) millennium earlier than is currently assumed". (p.38 - Aschbach: p. 15)

-- [Wilhelm] Wackernagel (1806-1869 - Professor from Berlin at the University of Basel [web10]) ([book of] 1848 [cannot be found]) also believes that the works of FAKE Roswitha were certainly not written in the “Middle Ages”

Wackernagel quote (translation):
“that the dramas of Roswitha cannot be regarded as a fact in the development of German or Latin literature of the Middle Ages.” (S.38)

Aschbach found out that the works of Roswitha are a FAKE (plagiatism)
-- The comedy “Abraham” is by author Rosweid from the book "Leyendas de los padres antiguos" (“Erzväterlegenden”), printed in Latin in Nuremberg 1478, published in German in Augsburg 1488 (p.38 - Aschbach: p.17)
-- The legend of “Pelagius” is full of contradictions and IMpossibilities (Muslims pray to golden statues, a homo incident is described etc.) (p.38)
-- A legend of FAKE Roswitha is said to have been copied later by Father Florez and is presented in his own “collection of legends of saints” being called "Holy Spain" (ESP orig.: “España sagrada”) (p.38)
-- the 6th legend of FAKE Roswitha (the “Faust legend”) is typically Renaissance (p.38)

The style of FAKE Roswitha is based on FAKE “ancient masters”
-- The works of FAKE Roswitha are stylistically oriented towards FAKE Ovid, FAKE Terence and FAKE Plautus, who in the “10th c.” were still “completely unknown” (p.38)
-- The verse and rhyme technique was in the “10th century” still UNknown (p.38)
-- Sometimes Greek expressions flash up, which are “unthinkable” for a Jesus Fantasy nun in the 10th century (p.38)
-- The authority [cr. Vatican] simply waits until the truther dies, and then the matter is “over” for them [cr. Vatican] and all lies will continue as before (p.38)
-- The literature lexicons are censored [by the Vatican] and literature experts do not pay attention to Aschbach's analysis [or are blackmailed not to say anything] (p.39)
-- Aschbach published the 2nd edition in 1868 - he was not only a professor in Vienna, but was elevated to “knighthood” in 1870 and his scientific works were thus honored - but some of his colleagues did not want to believe him [and defended the wonder of the world that PERFECT dramas in PERFECT Latin, including brothel truths, should have been available from a NUN] (p.39)

-- Aschbach still says on page 113: The glorifying poems for the FAKE emperor Otto I are from the early days of “Humanism”, “much talk, few facts”, are based on “old sources” (p.39)
-- The ceremonial speech "Panegyricus" is copied from Widukind (p.39)
-- Günther Ligurinus is copied from Otto of Freisingen (p.39)
-- The "Epos of beautiful Saxony" (Latin: "Epos de bello Saxonico") is copied from Lambert von Hersfeld (p.39)
-- Aschbach concludes: "In this way, it was possible to deceive even experts and men of science." (p.39 - Aschbach: p.113)

And now, see how ALL is a FAKE:

Unfortunately, Aschbach did not also examine FAKE Widukind, and there are also IMpossibilities with FAKE Otto von Freisingen: "with 14 years to be a provost , abbot of a monastery at 18, bishop at 23". FAKE Lambert of Hersfeld, however, is already clearly defined by Aschbach as a forger. They were all known BEFORE FAKE Roswitha, [but apparently not so well known as to expose FAKE Roswitha or her forgers immediately] (p.39).


3.2 The FAKE poet Apuleius and his work "The Golden Donkey" (with the romance: "Cupid and Psyche")

-- The FAKE poet Apuleius [ca.123-170] was totally "unknown", today he is "famous" (p.39)

Supplement: Mossad Wikipedia means that the FAKE Apuleius would be "world literature" from the FAKE Roman Empire
Quote Mossad-Wikipedia (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apuleius) - translation:
"Apuleius (also Apuleius Madaurensis, Apuleius of Madaura or Apuleius of Madauros; * around 123 in Madauros (link), today's village of M'Daourouch in north-eastern Algeria; † probably after 170) was a Roman-Numidian writer, orator and philosopher (Middle Platonist) of antiquity. Apuleius owes his lasting fame to his main work, the Latin novel "Metamorphoses", also known as The Golden Donkey, which is considered part of world literature."

-- He is credited with an INVENTED defensive treatise "De Magia" ("On Magic") (pp.39-40)
-- His FAKE main work is said to be the erotic story "The Golden Donkey", with autobiographical elements, an "orientalizing fairy tale collection", and such did not even exist in his time, therefore, this is "a bold new creation" (p.40)


Supplement: “The Golden Donkey” (lat. Asinus aureus, also titled like "The Golden Ass") contains the story “Cupid and Psyche” (the Fantasy Love God with a king's daughter)
-- The novel “The Golden Donkey” (Lat.: Asinus aureus) is multi-layered, enigmatic, “sophisticated narrative technique”, “skillful concealment of intentions”, incorporating the “tale of Cupid and Psyche”, “love affair between the god "Cupid" [God of Love] and the king's daughter ”Psyche", has been a constant inspiration for poets, writers, painters, sculptors, composers and choreographers, classical scholars [scientists of "Antiquity"], literary theorists, psychoanalysts and legal historians since the Renaissance. [A “donkey” is NOT mentioned].

-- According to the British Encyclopedia, the Latin style of Apuleius is “strange and has a strong antiquarian coloring” (p.40).
-- A “precursor play” by Lukios of Patrae is claimed, but it is rather a ‘parallel’, a “parody of the typical medieval novels and cannot be older than these.” (S.40)
-- The entire work of the “Golden Donkey” (strange translation indicate: "The Golden Ass") is said to exist in a single manuscript and to date from the 11th century, copied from a model from 395 in Rome and corrected in Constantinople in 397, then the model “returned to Italy” (p.40 - Brunnhölz 1971: p.116)

Essay by Franz Brunhölzl (1971): On the Problem of the Cassinese Classical Heritage (orig. German: Zum Problem der Casinenser Klassikerüberlieferung - essay Marburg Scholar Society (Marbuger Gel. Gesellschaft) nr. 3, Munich) (1975); [In]: History of Latin Literature of the Middle Ages (Geschichte der lateinischen Literatur des Mittelalters) (Munich) (p. 276)

-- The “rediscovery” of the erotic Golden Donkey (Golden Ass) took place in 1480, until then the work is said to have been “completely unknown” (p.40)

-- Tacitus is in the same codex: "The Annals and Histories of Tacitus are also contained in the same manuscript, the "only codex", and only there." (S.40)

-- the real poet of the erotic golden donkey (golden ass) could have been a “Greek refugee” after the expulsion from Byzantium (1453), since the FAKE Apuleius claims to be a "Greek" and to have taught himself Latin: “and learned Latin only late and without instruction” (p.40)
-- there are “unique linguistic creations” which, according to Topper, are “an effective means of distracting critically thinking readers” (p.40)

-- another example is the FAKE Aelian (Aelianus 170-222 [web04]), who is presented as a FAKE Roman writing in “Attic Greek” (p.40)
-- FAKE Apuleius and FAKE Aelianus have one thing in common: They hate tyrants, and expressing this is only possible in “Humanism” (p.40)

-- Apuleius was a rebel with “new word creations, his own language style and his own novella technique”, used folkloristic elements as a completely new element (p.40), used an African fairy tale in a central place (p.40-41) - demons are presented as “good beings” (p.41)

-- another FAKE work by FAKE Apuleius is “Metamorphoses”, supposedly first published “anonymously” in FAKE Rome, later ‘attributed’ to FAKE Apuleius (p.41) - Boccaccio copied from it and incorporated elements into his “Decameron” - but the process could also have been the other way round p.41)

Giovanni Boccaccio, Italian "writer" of "Humanism" 1313-1375 [web08]

-- the translation of the “Golden Donkey” ("The Golden Ass") into German was made by Nikolaus von Wyle in 1480 - revised by August Rode in 1783, republished in 1923 (p.41)

-- Such erotic literature is only possible in “Humanism” from the 15th century onwards, the story is "funny" and full of “biting mockery” (p.41)

-- The "rediscovery" of the FAKE Apuleius took place in 1475 by [a "Humanist"] Poggio (p.41)

[Supplement:
There are many people "Poggio", here is one but the numbers do not fit with 1475:
Giovanni Francesco Poggio Bracciolini (lat.: Poggius Florentinus): Italian "Humanist" writer 1380-1459 [web09]

-- The FAKE Apuleius in his work "Golden Donkey" ("Golden Ass") also incites against "witches and their arts", but the witch trials were according to Topper "from 1450" [other authors say clearly, witch trials began in 1250 appr.]  (p.41)

-- The FAKE Apuleius also plays with names with allusions and the names of the FAKE "ancient writers" are mentioned as well as the FAKE of "ancient mythology" always interwoven, a "typical syncretistic manner of the humanists" (p.41)

-- Some scenes are based on the Orient: "orientalizing" (p.41) [the contact of "Christianity" with the Orient officially exists only from 1099 since the Crusades]
-- Some scenes are from the FAKE Church with "Amen" or "Lord's Supper", translations are different, one time "turban" or another time "braided cap" is translated etc. (p.41)
-- The final chapter of the "Golden Donkey" is a "celebrated speech honoring to the [FAKE] Church", also "archaizing" and "Egyptianizing", this was the spirit of the "Renaissance", on a "Field of Mars in Rome", a "joyful vision of the future" [and all is a FAKE including FANTASY-Jesus] (p.41)

-- the FAKE “St. Augustine” (placed around 400) mentions the “Golden Donkey” (also: "Golden Ass") of FAKE Apuleius, at the same time considering FAKE Apuleius “a magician”, so that perhaps that is why FAKE Apuleius wrote a FAKE defense treatise “De Magia” (“On Magic”) (p.41)

[Thesis: The forger of Apuleius and Augustin could be THE SAME].



3.3 Nicholas Cusanus (1401-1464): a mathematician, physicist and “rediscoverer”

-- Mathematician, physicist, he called for a new calendar after the defeat of Constantinople in 1454
-- He was also a “rediscoverer”, possibly also a forger and faker

-- Nikolaus Kusanus (Nikolaus von Kues) was allegedly a creative "Humanist" (p.42), in the end he was a Jesus Fantasy cardinal and bishop of Tyrol [Innsbruck?] (p.43)
-- The statement that he is said to have been a fisherman's son of a Moselle fisherman has been proven as INVENTED by Sigrid Hunke (p.43 - Hunke: Europe's own religion (orig. German: Europas eigene Religion), 2nd edition 1983: p.272)

Supplement: Mossad Wikipedia says that he came from the Moselle-Rhineland: “ *1401 in Kues an der Mosel (link), today Bernkastel-Kues (link); † August 11, 1464 in Todi, Umbria (link) [...] German philosopher, theologian, cardinal, mathematician and physicist ” [web05]

-- Kusanus was a pioneer with a groundbreaking cosmos model, a model for Copernicus [1473-1543], Galileo [1564-1642] and [Giordano] Bruno [1548-1600] (p.42), and it seems that contemporaries of Kusanus did not read his pioneering work, but only the generation after him, [strange] (p.42)
-- He wrote an analysis of the Koran: Cribratio Alkorani (“Sighting of the Koran”, three books) (p.42 and [web05]), which is said to have been written after the Muslim occupation of Constantinople after 1454 [web05]
-- As well as a “Calendar Improvement” (German: Kalenderverbesserung" - orig. Latin: Reparatio kalendarii, 1436), 150 years before the introduction of the Gregorian calendar (p.42) [when 1000 years were invented with the maneuver "J" - "I" - "1" - see Christoph Pfister: Die Matrix der alten Geschichte]
-- In his "Sighting of the Koran" he incites against the "pagans" (all those who are not "Christians") and he stated that because of the defeat of Constantinople the FAKE Church was in need of reform in terms of "calendar and spirit of the time", the Jesus Fantasy Church was simply "weak [...] against the Muslims" (p.42)
-- The suggestion is only taken up a generation later by Regiomontanus (Johannes Müller (1436-1476) [web06]), who developed a calendar correction (p.42) [where 1000 years were invented for installing a FAKE Antiquity and FAKE Middle Ages].

Supplement: Nikolaus Cusanus was one of the "rediscoverers" of the works of FAKE "Antiquity"
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolaus_von_Kues

Mossad Wikipedia quote (translation):
"Among the manuscripts with works of ancient writers that he discovered was one that contained twelve previously unknown comedies by Plautus (link) and one with the first six books of the Annals (link) of Tacitus (link)." [Mossad Wikipedia web05].

[Conclusion: Perhaps Cusanus was one of the FAKERS of the works of FAKE "Antiquity" that he had "found" - this may be a PRINCIPLE of finding the FAKERS].

Which works are by Cusanus and which are not?
[-- apparently many works were also "attributed" to Cusanus]
-- the evidence for the authenticity of Kusanus' works "already fills many volumes" (p.43)
-- there is a lack of research (p.43)


3.4. Conspiracy?

-- the FORGED Donation of Constantine (4th century)
-- FAKE letters from a FAKE pope on a FAKE journey in 1132
-- Niemitz's conclusion: Europe from 800 to 1400 was tolerant and multi-religious

Facts about the FAKE Donation of the FAKE Constantine

-- The Donation of Constantine is a FAKE, was exposed by "Humanists Lorenzo Valla (Secretary of the Pope), Piccolomini (later Pope Pius II), and Nicholas of Cusa" (p. 43)
-- Ulrich von Hutten had Valla's work printed in 1519 (p. 43)
-- The Greek text of the "Donation" was apparently written by "Latins" in Rome (p. 43)

-- A FAKE Emperor Constantine supposedly granted territory to the FAKE Vatican [Vatican does not exist before 1407] and recognized the supremacy of the FAKE Church of Rome in FAKE Rome (p. 43)
-- Humanists believe that the FAKE donation was forged in the 8th century (p. 43)
-- Topper claims that the forgery originated shortly before the schism of 1056 "and sealed the split of the churches - Rome from Byzantium" (p. 43 - Illig: The Invented Middle Ages - orig. German: Das erfundene Mittelalter (1996): p. 142 f.)
-- According to Topper, the reason for placing the forgery in the 8th century is solely for the propaganda that there existed already a "Catholic Church" at that time (p. 43)
-- The forgery operation of the "Big Action" also included deliberate temporal misplacements [to make the church appear "bigger"], and the "gigantic conspiracy theory" [by the criminal Gay-Drug-Vatican]  is unfortunately true [it is ALL a lie] (Niemitz: Kammeier, critically honored (orig. German: Kammeier, kritisch gewürdigt -  1991)

The following example is a good example how the criminal monks and bishops of the Vatican are FAKING things:

Facts about FAKE letters from the FAKE pope on a FAKE journey in 1132
-- Niemitz provides in his book "Kammeier, critically honored" another example of a mega INVENTION: The "letters of recommendation" from the pope on a journey from France to Lombardy in 1132 were supposed to "document" the journey, but cannot be taken seriously, because out of 80 letters, only on 3 of them is a date indicated, not even the first letter has got a date, making 77 letters historically "worthless", a "nonsense" (p.44)
-- The letters depict "the past", but then depict "projected events", in order to "historically validate the Papal journey as well as other mentioned events" (p.44)
-- Niemitz concludes at the end of his work "Kammeier, critically honored" (1991, p.31) (translation):

"The Church which was united at the beginning of the 15th century organizes a large forgery operation by destroying or altering all documents, so that the documents that have come down to us tell a false history. This operation cannot be without contradictions in the documents which distribute in many different countries (respectively they were created decentrally)." Here, a lot of data was forged to keep a "pseudo-history relatively free of contradictions" (p. 44).

-- As a result, historians today always have "work" to find out what might be true and what is not (p. 44)
-- Or many contradictions are intentionally composed so that the masses are unsafe and a "control" of history becomes impossible (p. 44).


Niemitz with "Counterproposal of Medieval History"
-- The chronology gets lost and one wonders what the truth was, while Niemitz already presents a "Counterproposal of Medieval History" (p. 44):

Niemitz's conclusion: Europe from 800 to 1400 was tolerant and multi-religious
Between 800 and 1400, the truth looks as follows:
-- There was NO Pope, NOR Universal Church, NOR any Vatican - all Jesus Fantasy churches were organized regionally - many people had other religions (which were broadly referred to as "pagans" [or non-believers] or "free thinkers" [or even called dissenters] by the cr. Vatican Church) [those with different beliefs were to be considered "worthless" - this discrimination against other religions is working partially until today - 2025].
-- Regional hierarchies are forming with Jesus Fantasy bishops and Jesus Fantasy dogmas
-- And now Niemitz clearly concludes that the Vatican wars against dissenters ("wars against heretics"), the Crusades, and the Investiture Controversy must be classified quite differently (p. 45).


3.5. The FAKE Tacitus and his FAKE Germania - in impossible Latin analogous to Sallust

Speech by Uwe Topper in 1996 at Hamburg: Tacitus = FAKE
-- Uwe Topper gave a lecture in May 1996 in Hamburg "Who actually invented the Germanic tribes?" (orig. German: "Wer hat eigentlich die Germanen erfunden?" - printed in June 1996) - a "lecture that describes the Germania of Tacitus as a forgery exposed" - but the historians who would have been concerned with it then quickly disappeared from the hall: "But  precisely those who should have listened attentively were sprinting away in the other direction." (p.45)
-- The German weekly review Mirror (German: Spiegel - issue no.44 of Oct 28, 1996) presented an article as an answer: with 12 pages of new knowledge about the "Germans" [in Zionist manner to demonize everything German] with the title "The Germans — our barbarian ancestors" with documentary proofs - without analyzing whether they are real or not (p.45)
-- Unfortunately the Spiegel had NO IDEA about the analysis work about the falsified sources of Hardouin, Baldauf, Kammeier and about the chronology research (p.45)
-- The inner circle of friends of Topper was divided: some protested that who portrayed the Germanic peoples as INVENTED would hurt "a holy feeling" (p.45)
-- The input for more reasoning was misunderstood by some because of the wrong headline, not the existence of the Germanic tribes as such, but only the "Germanic image" should be revised (p.45)

The works of FAKE Tacitus are INVENTED - details
-- with the analyses of Baldauf and Kammeier, Topper attempted in his 1996 lecture to prove that the works of FAKE Tacitus are forgeries "commissioned by Pope Pius II. between 1430 and 1470" (p.45)
-- Before 1420, such texts are UNKNOWN (p.45)
-- the "re-discoverer" Nicholas of Cusa [Cusanus] (1401-1464) is said to have been involved in the transaction of the Tacitus manuscript from Hesse to Rome (p.45 - book of Ludwig Pralle (1952): The Re-discovery of Tacitus (Fulda): p.70ff.)
-- But Cusanus apparently was not interested in the FAKE Tacitus texts, but probably he was aware of the forgery (p.45)


The FAKE-Germania by FAKE-Tacitus: NOT a gift to the Germans - prose writers with "their own language style" with heaps of "difficulties"
-- The FAKE-Germania is praised for example by the philologist Eduard Norden as an identity-creating "gift" (p.45 - Norden: Die germanische Urgeschichte in Tacitus Germania 1920), and such praise for the FAKE-Germanie is repeated again and again (p.45 - book by Siegfried Fischer-Fabian: The first Germans - orig. German: Die ersten Deutschen (Munich 1975): p.204)
-- In fact, the FAKE Tacitus with the FAKE Germania is NOT a gift, but was fabricated by a catholic monk on behalf of the cr. gay drug Vatican in the 15th century to fight the German emperors (p.46)
-- There can be NO question of a fame of the FAKE Tacitus in the FAKE "Antiquity": "little appreciated and little read", the level to the FAKE Cicero and FAKE Livius was simply too high - the FAKE Tacitus has a "strange" language - offers heaps of "difficulties" for the translation (p.46 - book by Arno Mauersberger: Tacitus Germania 1980, p.17)
-- the FAKE-Tacitus is a "prose writer", it is a degeneration of the language style (p.47 - book by Max Oberbreyer:  The Germania of Cornelius Tacitus (orig. German: Die Germania des Cornelius Tacitus 1910, p.4)
-- In short: The FAKE Tacitus had a "very own style of speech", says Topper (p.47)
-- Before the beginning of the "rediscovery" actions, which began in 1427 with Poggio, there is only "one single reference to the Germania text, and this is in the case of a monk of the same monastery in which the "minor writings" of Tacitus were later falsified, in Rudolf of Fulda (Yearbooks, 2nd part, on the year 852), as well as in his description of the transfer of the bones of St. [FAKE]-Alexander to Wildeshausen (completed by Meginhart,  see the book of Mr. Pralle "The Re-discovery of Tacitus" p. 46), where some notes from the [FAKE]-Germania are assigned to the Saxons." (p.47)

It is possible
-- that the students of Hrabanus used a separate source
-- that Rudolf's legend of saints was only written in the 15th century (suggestion by Kammeier)
-- that instead of the town of Fulda, also the town of Hersfeld could be the place of forgery (p. 47)
-- the forgery workshop for the FAKE-Germania was therefore located in Hesse in Fulda or Hersfeld, and strangely, in the FAKE-Germania, the Hessians ("Chatten") are rated much better than the other "Germanic barbarians" - the Hessians are described as a particularly independently organized people (p. 47).

The FAKE-Tacitus and the FAKE-Agricola in England
-- The Mr. FAKE Tacitus also composed a national work for England with "Agricola" (p. 47)
[-- the FAKE father-in-law of the FAKE Tacitus "Gnaeus Iulius Agricola" was supposed to have been "commander and governor in Britain [...] (40 – 93)" (p. 47)
-- but the contradictions are so blatant that both works of FAKE Tacitus - Germania and Agricola - are called into question (p. 47).


The "rediscovery" of the FAKE-Tacitus at Monte Cassino in 1370
-- The "rediscovery" was "accomplished" by Boccaccio in 1370 in the Jesus Fantasy Monastery Monte Cassino, the only manuscript discovered so far (p.47)
-- Monte Cassino was all in all the second most important place of forgery of the humanists, which was "in loose exchange" with the place of forgery of Fulda, whereby the manuscript in Monte Cassino differed by an "own style of "Benaventanian" minuscule" (p.47 - book by Franz Brunhölzl: On the problem of the Cassino Classic tradition 1971 (orig. German: Zum Problem der Casinenser Klassikerüberlieferung), p.111ff.)
-- Not even the name was right, because "Tacitus" was the invention of a humanist in the 15th century, before those times, the works were defined as by Gaius or Publius Cornelius (p.47)
-- In 1515, the FAKE Tacitus was printed and the Annals were merged with the Historiae (p.47 - Brunhölzl ibid. p.140)


Robert Baldauf: ALL "ancient authors" are INVENTED by "Humanists" - the "rediscoveries"
-- Robert Baldauf with his language research (book: History and Critics (orig. German: Historie und Kritik, 1902) concluded that all "ancient authors" are INVENTED by "Humanists" (p.47-48)
-- the first one was the papal secretary Poggio Bracciolini (1380-1459) who traveled a lot around and was able to "rediscover" many "old manuscripts" in monasteries, "especially in German monasteries in the basement" (p.48)
-- Poggio was also present at the Council of Constance 1414-1418 and at the same time visited the libraries of the monasteries of St. Gall, Weingarten, Einsiedeln and Reichenau and made a lot of "rediscoveries" (p.48) - 1419-1423 he was in England and made new "finds" again (p.48)


The FAKE Tacitus and its "variations" - with a trip from Hersfeld to Rome and "lost first copies"
-- A monk in the Hessian monastery of Hersfeld was commissioned by Poggio to copy the works of Tacitus - "after a few years the parchment codex was ready in form of three books of Tacitus, called "Smaller Writings" (orig. German: "kleinere Schriften" - compared to the Annals and Histories) was ready" - now followed the "humanist" Kusanus, who after long negotiations between the monastery of Hersfeld and the Vatican sold the FAKE-Tacitus in Rome, where they "did not appear until about 1455" - there is said to be a long correspondence about this sale and other documents, published in the book of Mr. Pralle (p.48)
-- In Rome 3 copies were made, in 1460 the "priceless precious parchment scroll" is said to have suddenly been lost (p.48), and also the copies "disappeared", of which there were 3 copies, but they "did not agree with each other at all" - so the trace is blurred, research is blocked and "the old age and the long tradition are made credible" (p.48)

The FAKE-Germania - the foreword of the Jesus Fantasy pope - this is a book for preaching of "Germanness" between the Rhine and the Don
-- The FAKE Germania was printed in Venice in 1470 and was the basis for Germanism until Baldauf came with his analytic works (book: History and Criticism 1902) (p.48)
-- In 1473 the book of FAKE Germania was printed a second time in Nuremberg [in Latin?] without becoming famous first (p.48)
-- Rumors say that the Jesus Fantasy pope Pius II wrote a commentary on the FAKE Germania in 1458 (p.48) - but the printing of the commentary took place only after his death in 1496 in Leipzig (p.48-49), and only now the FAKE Germania became a well-known book [in the Jesus Fantasy monastery schools for learning Latin] (p.49)

-- In Alsace, Mr. Wimpfeling used the edition of 1496 'to preach Germanness in Alsace' (p. 49).
[-- Mossad Wikipedia states: "Jakob Wimpfeling (also Wimpheling, Wympfeling; born July 27, 1450 in Schlettstadt (link); died November 17, 1528, same place) was a Catholic priest, poet, educator, and historian of German Humanism." (link) [web07]
-- Wimpfeling's "work" of preaching Germanness through the FAKE Germania was often copied in Alsace and also in Baden (p. 49).
[-- In Alsace this preaching work of Germanness was important against France - this was a heavy political affair - and one can imagine that such Germanness sermons also took place in other border regions and that the neighboring states had no pleasure of that at all...]

-- The first German commentary on the FAKE-Germania came from Ulrich von Hutten in 1502 (p. 49).
-- The intention of the Jesus Fantasy pope was to win the Germans over for himself, and the success came with his "commentary", in this way the population meant that the FAKE Tacitus was true, they increasingly identified with him, culminating in the formulation "gift of the kind fairy" (German: "Geschenk der gütigen Fee") [quote of Mr. Norden] (p. 49).
-- With the FAKE Germania, a "Germanic space and people between the Rhine and Don River" was defined - as a counterweight against English interests in continental Europe, which constantly threatened to annihilate the Catholic extremist French population [the Jesus Fantasy pope liked them most] (p.49)
-- However, the invention of a "Germanic identity" north of the FAKE-Limes in the first centuries AD is rather "pure wishful thinking" - there only thing that is true in the FAKE Germania are the "impenetrable forests" north of the Limes, the "Latin curtain" (pp.49-50) - and the Germanic identity only emerged in the "High Middle Ages" (p.50)

-- the FAKE-Limes later became a temporary dividing line between the Reformation and the Roman Catholic Church (p.50).

Conservative, loyal historians defend the FAKE Germania
The conservative historians loyal to the party line did not accept that the FAKE Germania was supposed to be a FANTASY and came up with counter-evidence, because the content should be true
-- with bog corpses, with "Roman stone reliefs" with side hair knots of the Suebi etc. (p.50)
-- with the Angrivarian Wall, a 10m wide and several meters high earth wall, "rediscovered" only in the 20th century (p.50)
-- with boat shapes (p.50)
-- with Nerthus wagons which were not common in northern Germany until the 15th century (p.50)
-- with iron spearheads which are confirmed by archaeologists even today [as of 2000] - they must have been known to the Hessian INVENTOR forging monk himself (p.50)

Truthers do NOT need this FAKE Germania
-- Mr. Siegfried Fischer-Fabian wrote the book "The First Germans" (Munich 1975), in which he remarks that the FAKE Germania is full of "ethnological wandering motifs", and peppered with falsified, ancient historiography - he was right (p.50)
-- In the FAKE-Germania it is described how to brew beer - maybe it was meant as a greeting to Rome, as if Rome had no beer (p.50)
-- Something DOES NOT fit together: "Wild barbarian" Germans are supposed to "live in cities and have writing" (p.50)
-- Something DOES NOT fit together: Steel swords of the Hyrcanians are described [at the Caspian Sea] (p.50)

-- In 1902, after the death of the Jesus Fantasy pope Pius II, "eight parchment sheets were found at Castle Ancona, where he had died, which were said to belong to a Tacitus manuscript from the 9th century' (p. 51)
-- And in Ancona, they also found a clay tile with the words "CIS RHENUM" ("at the other side of the Rhine"). This tile was supposed to support the FAKE Germania to make territorial claims against France - but the tile was immediately recognized as a forgery (Koestermann, E. (1970): Little essays (orig. German: Kleine Schriften - 3rd ed., Leipzig) (p.51)


Strange Latin of the FAKE Tacitus with "inconsistencies"- the Latin style of Sallust - the tactic of varied names - FAKE Bible has the same
-- The FAKE-Tacitus is full of "linguistic inconsistencies" with many expressions "which are not possible in classical Latin" (p.51)
-- The "language form" seems "Italian" (p.51)
-- For some words the meaning is disputed since then like the term "Decumates agri", which is not Latin at all (Eduard Norden: Alt-Germanien 1934)
-- Kammeier said that only parts of the FAKE-Germania were forged (Die Verfalsifikation der Germania des Tacitus 1935), apparently he did not know the linguistic analysis of Baldauf (p.51)
-- Kammeier also said that FAKE-Plinius and FAKE-Livius had not written anything about the Germanic tribes, and their texts in the FAKE Tacitus would appear distorted (p.51) and the purpose was not to commit oneself (p.51-52): The only Germanic god name "of interest" was "Tuiston", which occurs in 5 variations (p.52)
-- According to Kammeier, the Latin at FAKE Tacitus is like the FAKE Sallust, "up to the choice of words" (p.52).

The tactic of not committing oneself and presenting heaps of variations of names also occurs in the FAKE Bible (p.52).

[But also Sallust is a FAKE]:

The FAKE-Sallust (86-35/34 v.0)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sallust

"Gaius Sallustius Crispus (German: Sallust; * 1 October 86 BC in Amiternum; † 13 May 35 or 34 BC in Rome) was a Roman historian and politician. "

[The question is: WHO faked it?]

<<        >>

Sources
[web01] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Baldauf
[web02] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilias
[web03] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panegyrikus
[web04] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claudius_Aelianus
[web05] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolaus_von_Kues
[web06] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regiomontanus
[web07] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jakob_Wimpfeling
[web08] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Boccaccio
[web09] https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poggio_Bracciolini