Chapter 13: Addendum: The Russian advance [the research group led by the mathematician Mr. Fomenko]

13.1. Fomenko with clear evidence: History is INVENTED and laid out in a MATRIX - with "mathematical PATTERNS"

-- Book by Anatolij Fomenko: Empirico-statistical Analysis; 2 Volumes.; Dordrecht 1992

Topper quote:

"First the matematics professor Mr. Anatolij Fomenko (see his book "Empirico-statistical Analysis" from 1992) presented a completely new aspect about world history, and Mr. Christoph Marx is reporting about it since some years (see the review by Mr. Illig, ZS 2 - 1995; and see the review by Gabowitsch ZS 2 - 1997; a German translation is in preparation by Jähne and Hoffman from Humboldt University of Berlin).

Fomenko presents his thesis that all historiography is a FAKE of periodical constantly recurring schematic motif groups and the lists of rulers are fix patterns [= matrix principle]. Mr. Fomenko presents us the purely mathematic patterns which are repeated four or five times - and this pattern is determinating history of the [FAKE] Bible and of the [FAKE] history of the Christian West. The shifting of the pattern forming different periods is about 333 years, 1053 years, and 1778 years." (p.271)


13.2. Fomenko with clear evidence: The whole history before the Renaissance is a FAKE and has only SYMBOLIC VALUE - the MATRIX repeats itself continuously + history is "highly UNTRUSTWORTHY"

Bible+Antiquity+Middle Ages have THE SAME pattern and therefore this is all a FAKE from Renaissance:

Topper quote:

"The impression we have with this new data is clear: all history is invented literature with at most symbolic value, nothing else. This shows us clearly that since the 12th century the Western historians have copied one another and the pattern from the [FAKE] Bible is repeated in history of [FAKE] Antiquity as also in the [FAKE] Middle Ages - the history patterns are almost identical "histories". This cannot be just accidental, but it's obvious that this is an intentional repetition of history patterns. Therefore, all content of this is highly UNtrustworthy." (p.271)


13.3. Fomenko's research group often cites Mr. Hardouin and the Russian chemist Mr. Morozov - calculation of the date of the FAKE revelation

Topper Quote:

"The principle thought is similar to the thinking of other persons of Enlightenment, above all the system of Mr. Hardouin that is cited many times by the Russian authors. Russian chemist and history researcher Nikolai Morosov (1854-1946) had detected all the events before the 4th century of Christian chronology as a FAKE. Morosov is one of the main source for Fomenko, so. In his essay about (p.271) the [Fantasy] Revelation of John, he [Morosov] was rating the date of creation [of this Revelation] at 395 after [Fantasy] Christ (published in German in 1912 with an introduction of Mr. Drews). But this is also naïve in the same sense, especially when he claims to have calculated the exact day of writing this book on the basis of the star positions described in the Revelation of John:

the night from September 30 to October 1 (Julian calendar) of the year 395 after [Fantasy] Christ

Apart from the fact that no real star positions are described in the [fantasy] revelation and astrology was an abomination to John, we now know that a continuous calendar that would make it possible to calculate such star positions never existed. Not to mention that the assumption of the same movement of the earth or the starry sky over a millennium and a half cannot be proven. Nevertheless, there is a world of difference between Morozov's romantic view of the stars and Fomenko's mathematical search for grids." (p.272)

Well, let's see clearly: There are no real star positions describes in the [Fantasy] Revelation at all, and astrology was a horror for [Fantasy] John, this is well known nowadays that such a calender back to those times has never existed which would be the base for calculation such star positions. Add to this, Planet Earth could also change it's movement during 1000s of years so the starry sky would change from time to time, and there is no proof that this would not have happened. So we see that Mr. Morosov has a romantic view to the stars, but Fomenko has precisely found the mathematic pattern, this is the difference of their worlds." (p.272)


13.4. Mr. Heinsohn and Mr. Illig revise the time intervals - but they do not recognize the FAKE Torah and the FAKE Gospels with the Fantasy Jesus

Topper quote:

"Most important chronologists with a revision of the time line are next to Mr. Christph Marx also Mr. Heinsohn and Mr. Illig. Let's see first another Russian historian, a son of a rabbi, Mr. Immanuel Velikovsky (1895-1979). He was a psychoanalyst working in the "USA" publishing several books in which he wanted to prove the high age of the [Fantasy] Moses books again and again - in a fundamentalistic manner stating that all would be absolutely reliable. Well, then Mr. Heinsohn and Mr. Illig came with scientific criteria showing us new ways about the reconstruction of our history picture successfully. The worked with archeological facts and with new infestigation of documents that were rated as authentic to those times [being detected as a FAKES] - so this lead to new results:

The chronologies of almost all periods from the emergence of humanity to the year 1000 after [Fantasy] Christ need to be revised. History is far shorter than the [FAKE] Bible or modern archaeologists would have us believe. However, Heinsohn and Illig, despite all criticism, still remain close to the blind literalism of Velikovsky by taking the [FAKE] Bible and the [FAKE] Church writers (such as Eusebius, etc.) seriously with their lists of names, only shifting the dates, making the sequences more plausible, and trying to reconcile it all with archaeological findings, without (p.272) realizing that this work leads just to another fiction without presenting real facts." (p.273)


13.5. Fomenko only sees mathematics - he doesn't have archaeology

Topper Quote:

"After all, their "evidence-based" method calls into question Fomenko's elaborate statistical research results, because he does not include the results of archaeology in his patterns. Fomenko also believes in books to an extent that only rigid monotheists can be, which is why he stubbornly adheres to the outdated actualist principle of academic geology, which exposes his use of the unquestioned data base to academic ridicule. Since he also has to do violence to the stereotypical historical data, which he usually only takes from processing literature, in order to press them into his mathematical patterns, his method becomes suspicious. Nevertheless, it initially gave to Mr. Illig and his colleagues hope for a fresh approach. Unfortunately, Fomenko's restriction to mostly Russian and Central European literature leaves little room for more far-reaching conclusions. What began as a critique of the patterns of European historiography is now growing into a mystically tinged fantasy of golden Russian legends for a devout masses of believers ignorant of history, which can only be seen against the background of the lack of humanities education, as it is prevalent in Russia for more than two generations. This complete lack of orientation is an extreme of fundamentalist faith in books, just Velikovsky is a rare exampe against it." (p.273)

13.6. Christoph Marx presenting Fomenko's pioneering work in Hamburg in 1996 - the true story remains in the dark because all initial sources have been destroyed [by the Jesuits]

Topper quote:

"Mr. Christoph Marx discussed Fomenko's mathematical approach in detail in the group of time reconstructors (in May 1996 in Hamburg) and emphasized "that the philological sources of the late "Middle Ages" and the early modern period — as is generally known — must be perceived as "FAKE" practically from A to Z, and the pure "truth" remains behind the scenery not being analysed until today [1996]."

[because all the old sources were destroyed by the cr. Jesuits, so that only the INVENTIONS of the criminal Vatican would count].

However, he continues saying that "it would be wrong to see falsified representations in these sources, rating the creators as conscious fakers having selfish motives selling such fake chronologies - this was more a collective neurosis" he means (1996,p.5). With this is presented sharply (p.273) that it will impossible to research the true history. With this essentially psychoanalytic explanatory pattern, the chance of an almost reality-based historical research is buried." (p.274)

<<        >>  

Sources